Post to This Thread
Kevin 15 Jun 2018, 13:51
If anyone can speak French, an interesting video about a moderate myope having an eye test
13 Jun 2018, 16:23
13 Jun 2018, 00:22
I suppose that the topic is perversion.
Anonymous 12 Jun 2018, 23:54
For Pete's sake, where are the moderators here? Can we clean out the preceding garbage and get back on topic?
05 Jun 2018, 09:19
Rob 05 Jun 2018, 01:33
Isn't here anybody present who will delete the neonazi fascistic ramblings of a Moron who nnaes himself after the man who had more than a hundred million people killed and the other brainless shithead who stands to the completely demented nobrainer and emotional dwarf called Trump?
04 Jun 2018, 20:09
Glass Lenses 29 May 2018, 12:47
When the Muslim hoards totally overrun Europe, sodomites will be hanging in the trees, and flying off of rooftops.
The ones in the U.S.should be thankful to Donald Trump, and his tough policies on immigration control. MAGA.
Glass Lenses 29 May 2018, 12:39
You are correct about the sodomites.
The anonymous one that has responded to your posts, surely is ashamed of his deviant lifestyle, hence the vulgarity, and lack of a username.
29 May 2018, 01:20
LikeLenses, your racist posts are getting old. Shut the fuck up.
Führer 27 May 2018, 16:58
Well, we certainly know what you do is not normal, and is not even healthy.
So don't try to tell us that it is. And don't try and tell us that it involves LOVE, because it does not. It is plain, and simple perversion.
27 May 2018, 15:37
Führer,...mentally ill people fixate and obsess over what they THINK gay people do, and are into. They truly desire it for themselves, but can't have it, so they don't want anyone else to have it,..kind of like "The Fox and the Grapes"; degrade what you can't obtain.
Führer 27 May 2018, 14:45
Mentally ill people that love to interact with feces, and urine for sexual gratification come to this thread.
They try to pander their perversion off as love.
27 May 2018, 11:18
27 May 2018, 00:27
The demon of homosexuality.
20 May 2018, 21:51
20 May 2018, 21:28
LikeLenses 19 May 2018, 04:13
Ok it's me.
18 May 2018, 22:10
USA, USA, USA.
18 May 2018, 21:36
Monkeys, Apes, and Gorrilas Association
Shame on you for referring to the Obama family in such a way.
You are such a racist.
It is well known that Obama is a sodomite, and the so called Michelle is a disgusting transvestite.So then your definition of MAGA certainly applies to them.
17 May 2018, 18:03
MAGA is well-known worldwide as then sensual mating vocalization that MONKEYS, APES, and GORILLAS use when they want to have intercourse of a member of the same sex. All Conservatives secretly know this and this is why they insert MAGA into all their messages.
psst... I am a Conservative and I probably wasn't supposed to tell you this, so please don't tell anyone as they will immediately deny the truth!
17 May 2018, 12:43
17 May 2018, 12:42
17 May 2018, 12:42
17 May 2018, 09:15
14 May 2018, 19:17
Agreed, in this day and age there are so many new STD's that sodomites pass around.
13 May 2018, 08:17
13 May 2018, 08:11
13 May 2018, 08:07
James 12 May 2018, 03:56
I for one am loving the remedial level trolling. That was an excellent burn if it was 1992!
Glass Lenses 08 May 2018, 18:38
It is not surprising that you people get Aids.
tinyeyes 07 May 2018, 01:10
I forgot to mention that the really important "sweet spot" is his anus.
tinyeyes 06 May 2018, 17:17
James, I agree about having a "sweet spot" as far as myopia attracting me in guys, and it's not a number for me either, but probably usually corresponds with a number. I want them to be as myopic as I am preferably, (I'm -9) and really, the higher the myopia the better, but I have little experience with seeing or being around guys more than the mid-teens. I also want them to be able to function well with glasses or contacts, but I'm extremely aroused by seeing the effects of not having corrective lenses on -- like holding things close to read, closing an eye, and squinting. And the stronger the glasses look, the better -- huge cut-in, "power rings", flashing reflective flat lens fronts, and of course, tiny eyes. It seems like the "dream" prescription for having all this and also functioning well is about -12 to -17.
James 04 May 2018, 15:41
maybe i should have been clearer....i understand in theory all the challenges of extreme myopia (as a fetishist of 3 decades' standing I should hope so!) and the sweet spot etc. This guy wasn't wearing myodiscs, as I said, just small oval frames, but that's not really what's important here.
I should clarify when I said what he was doing was crazy i wasn't meaning he was a crazy person or underestimating or making light of the challenges of this kind of vision. I just meant it struck ME as crazy that this - almost touching the phone to his one eye, basically - was the best solution for a function (looking at your phone and reading things and writing messages etc.) that in 2018 most of us do dozens if not HUNDREDS of times a day. Surely there's something better? Surely even carrying a pair of intermediate prescription glasses is better, particularly for when you know you're not going to need to see in the distance e.g. if you're going to be sitting on a train for half an hour, as this guy was?
With all that said, I also understand that this guy knows his vision and what works best for the challenge better than I ever could, so he was obviously implementing the solution he felt most appropriate!
Patrick B 04 May 2018, 09:30
Hi James --
I have extreme myopia (-26/-27) and totally concur with what Cactus Jack says. As myopia begins to creep over -20, most myopic people begin to consider myodisc lenses which allows for thinner and lighter lenses which usually can be fitted closer to a person's face thus improving visual acuity and helping to minimize problems of minimification. Contacts are still the best for high myopes. The myodisc "bowl" is usually around 20 - 25 MM wide and mimics the "sweet spot" found in conventional full-aperture lenses. When I switched from conventional lenses to myodiscs I was already used to seeing through the sweet spot of the conventional lens which is about the same size as the myodisc bowl. If you ever notice the body language of a high myope, you will see that they always have to turn their head more to see something to their left/right since their vision is pretty much restricted to that small "sweet spot". In short, peripheral vision is somewhat limited. I also have heard that some labs can do bifocal lenses in extreme powers, but generally the answer is no. The area of the myodisc bowl generally is too small for a successful bifocal simply because there isn't adequate space. The same is true for high-strength conventional lenses which require smaller frames to keep lens thickness to reasonable levels. I have reading/computer glasses of a lesser power which I need to see up close. If I don't have them with me, then I have to pull my glasses down my nose a bit to read. Not ideal, but something you simply get used to.
GreginColo 04 May 2018, 07:28
Thanks James for the beyond interesting sighting that you shared, and the details and observations provided. I would tend to agree with you and Alex that the range of upper single digit myopia to as high as it can go without being life disruptive would be my level of interest. Also how rather ordinary looking guys, which most of us probably are, can become of much more interest when wearing moderate to high level minus Rx's.
Cactus Jack 03 May 2018, 17:49
I cannot comment on anything but vision and optics, with high myopia.
High minus lenses have a very small “sweet spot” at the optical center of the lens where best Visual Acuity (VA) occurs. That typically means that the lenses must be mounted in the frames so the central axis of vision passes through the Optical Center (OC) of the lens. Outside the OC, there is considerable distortion and aberration.
The lenses, in his very small frame glasses, actually may have started life a a myocisc. Rather than mount the lenses in a larger frame where the area outside the myodisc bowl is useless, they chose to use a very small frame and cut the lens down to fit the frame and eliminate the carrier portion of the lens blank.
Because of the lens size and the power of the lenses, it may not be physically possible to have a reading segment in the lens and leave enough room for a usable distance segment. Bifocals are very difficult or sometime impossible to include in a myodisc lens.
If his prescription was -20 and he tried to read without his glasses, he would have to hold the text about 2 inches or 5 cm from his Cornea. To use both eyes simultaneously to focus close, he would have required extreme convergence, probably in excess of 60 prism diopters to not see double. The solution was to not even attempt to use both eyes simultaneously, but simple close 1 eye and eliminate the need for extreme convergence.
He might have had some slightly less minus single vision reading and computer glasses at home.
Another issue that occurs with very high minus glasses is image minification. It is common for people who need very high minus glasses to experience a reduction in VA because of that minification. The image gets so small on the Retina that the eye cannot detect very small objects or letters. Needing very high minus glasses is like wearing very high PLUS lenses inside the eye. TheY MAGNIFY the images on the retina and make it easier to see the small text on the cell phone.
He was not doing anything crazy, he was just solving his vision problems with the tools he had at hand.
James 03 May 2018, 14:25
The lower threshold is easier to determine for me. If he can function well or even semi-OK without glasses, the turn on factor goes down exponentially. Very low prescription glasses are actually worse than no glasses at all for me; at least with no glasses, I can imagine there may be strong contacts, especially when something intangible about the eyes themselves is tipping me off that he's a high myope. In practice, nothing below -6 (and more like 08 if I'm being honest) really turns my head.
Alex 03 May 2018, 12:57
You raise a pretty interesting point,i do agree with you that having a myopia which really impairs vision even with glasses is a pretty big turn off.
What is so sexy about myopia is how it does give a semi-disability which weaken the eyesight without causing a great harm,after all you just need a pair of glasses to correct it,which are form of dependance on their own because one need always them to see.
I wonder if there's also a sweet spot in the reverse direction for too low prescriptions.
James 03 May 2018, 12:22
Greetings fellow sodomites in spectacles! Sidenote: as a non-wearer-but-admirer of spectacles sodomite, that characterisation actually made me feel left out!
Anyway, today on the train there was a guy with one of these see-them-once-a-year knockout Rx's. He must've been close to -20, or maybe more, no myodiscs but teeny wire rim tiny ovals. Probably late 30's or early 40's, average height and weight and Indian or Pakistani, but nothing that'd attract my attention without the glasses.
He seemed to be able to see fine in the distance, so there was no sense of him being low vision (important for what I'm about to ask next), but was doing crazy things to see and type texts on his phone i.e. looking over his phone,closing one eye and basically almost touching the phone with the other eye. Honestly, why not just get multifocals or bifocals in a bigger frame!
Anyway, it did get me thinking about something only slightly related, which is: do other people have a myopia "sweet spot" beyond which they're no longer turned on, as I do? For me, the sweet spot is not a number....they can be as nearsighted as possible (the more the better really) as long as they get good usable vision and don't seem "disabled" in a narrow sense. So no low vision aids, no canes, obvious inability to see enough even with the glasses....those kinds of things obliterate any arousal for me.
I know that wouldn't be true for everyone here, but was wondering if anyone else had ever considered this for themselves. Thoughts?
27 Apr 2018, 21:52
This thread is dedicated to SIS, sodomites in spectacles.
25 Apr 2018, 09:09
Sounds like the person in the last post is having envy issues. Maybe you need to go somewhere else.
24 Apr 2018, 22:26
Why don't you degenerates limit your posts only to glasses?
Why do you need to refer to men's anatomy?
We all know how you pervert natural sex, and find fascination with feces, and urine, but just keep that in your closet.
24 Apr 2018, 10:08
22 Apr 2018, 18:29
GreginColo 14 Apr 2018, 10:23
Thanks te, for sharing your Target sighting and for your detailed description of the guy. You raise some interesting questions/possibilities there, which I certainly don't know the answer to, either as to his preference or his glasses. Another possibility, I guess, could be that he is primarily a contacts wearer, so doesn't care as much about the look of his glasses, and maybe you were just fortunate enough to catch him on a day when his eyes were tired of contacts. Again, thanks for sharing the sighting.
tinyeyes 14 Apr 2018, 08:26
I had a decent sighting yesterday that made me wonder about something.
I was at Target, and saw a young Asian guy from behind looking at groceries and choosing some bottles of juice. He was late 20s/early 30s, dressed in stylish workout pants, small toned build with a nice ass, and of course, glasses. I suspected high RX since he was Asian, and then I saw the light flashing in that way (still viewing from behind him) that shows the lenses were strong. I was discreet, but stayed in the area long enough to see him when he turned around with his shopping cart, and yes, his small rectangular frames looked great and the cut-in was deep. Maybe -10. Gay or straight? I have a very hard time figuring that out these days, but hopefully gay!
What I also noticed was that even though his frames were smaller, there was plenty of unpolished lens edge visible protruding beyond the black frames. That was a little surprising to me -- young, stylish guy, who's very myopic, but apparently didn't bother to get high index lenses for his glasses. I wonder, was it just not recommended, or is it a cultural thing not to care? Or it could possibly be that he doesn't like the vision with higher index lenses. Of course, I love the look, but I think his lenses could have been thinner at that size, unless I underestimated the prescription and it's up higher in the teens than I thought (I only got a quick glance facing him, trying to be discreet.)
At any rate, it was a sexy sighting.
GreginColo 29 Mar 2018, 16:55
Another trip to the local big box home improvement store today and another good sighting, although not as good as the one shared recently. This time I had to do a special order of some flooring and was fortunate enough to be helped by a younger myopic guy (his general looks and glasses reminded me lot of daviewheeler, if you know who I mean). We spent about 15 minutes at his desk while he processed the order and I am guessing he is -7 or so, but several times he had to move his face closer to the screen to read some finer details. After the order was finished, I was hoping for a minute or 2 of general chat, but there was another customer waiting for help so I didn't want to impose any further delay on the waiting customer.
I also agree the recent Facebook post was off-topic and inappropriate for this thread.
29 Mar 2018, 14:18
That last Facebook post. It is nether about guys, glasses or indeed guys in glasses. And indeed things related to children are as far as I’m aware banned from here. Is this really an appropriate post to make? This just feels like another person trying to start yet another fight.
I have my own opinions and I’m not going to argue you its point. But this feels like yet another example of this site’s terrible moderation allowing the anonymous to destroy it.